O'DONNELL v. LRP PUBLICATIONS, INC.
PATRICIA O'DONNELL |
LRP PUBLICATIONS, INC. |
2:2008cv01560 |
April 1, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Bucks |
ANITA B. BRODY |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1981 Sex Discrimination |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER OF MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC. #32) that DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #21) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 2/16/2010. 2/16/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL(mo, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: O'DONNELL v. LRP PUBLICATIONS, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: PATRICIA O'DONNELL | |
Represented By: | RUFUS A. JENNINGS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LRP PUBLICATIONS, INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.