BARAKAT v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: ADLA A. BARAKAT
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2008cv01696
Filed: May 28, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: ROBERT F. KELLY
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR REVIEW CONSISTENT WITH THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 1/22/2009. 1/22/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED.(mbh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARAKAT v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ADLA A. BARAKAT
Represented By: ERIC CHARLES SPERO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?