CICCOTELLI et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| RICHARD CICCOTELLI and MAUREEN MASON |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2008cv01886 |
| April 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Taxes Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| JAN E. DUBOIS |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 26:6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED. THAT PART OF THE ORDER OF 4/2/2009 AWARDING PLAINTIFFS INTEREST FROM THE DATE PLAINTIFFS' 2000 FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN WAS FILED IS VACATED. REFERENCE IN THE MEMORANDUM OF 4/2/2009 TO PLAINTIFFS' ENTITLEMENT TO INTEREST FROM THE DATE PLAINTIFFS' 2000 FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN WAS FILED IS DELETED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/9/2009. 6/10/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000.00, LESS A NY TAX DUE, PLUS INTEREST FROM THE DATE PLAINTIFFS' 2000 FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN WAS FILED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK SHALL MARK THE CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 4/2/2009. 4/6/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(mbh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
