ELLISON v. ASTRUE

ELLISON v. ASTRUE

Plaintiff:	MAILON ELLISON
Defendant:	MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number:	2:2008cv02101
Filed:	May 9, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 5, 2009	Filing 15 ORDER THAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARACAPPA'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF MAILON ELLISON A ND AGAINST DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER DATED NOVEMBER 27, 2007 AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPEALS COUNCIL ON MARCH 31, 2008 WHICH DENIED BENEFIT S TO PLAINTIFF MAILON ELLISON IS REVERSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARACAPPA'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 4/30/09. 5/5/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 5, 2009

Filing 15 ORDER THAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARACAPPA'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF MAILON ELLISON A ND AGAINST DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER DATED NOVEMBER 27, 2007 AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPEALS COUNCIL ON MARCH 31, 2008 WHICH DENIED BENEFIT S TO PLAINTIFF MAILON ELLISON IS REVERSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARACAPPA'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 4/30/09. 5/5/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ELLISON v. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAILON ELLISON
Represented By:	MICHAEL PATRICK BOYLE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?