SIMMS v. TRIMAC TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY SIMMS
Defendant: TRIMAC TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Case Number: 2:2008cv02694
Filed: June 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: STEWART DALZELL
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2003 Job Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 26 , IT IS HEREBY GRANTED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 6/8/09. 6/8/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, ) (VACATED)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SIMMS v. TRIMAC TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY SIMMS
Represented By: ANDREW S. ABRAMSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRIMAC TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?