AMERICAN INFASTRUCTURE, INC v. ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District AMERICAN INFASTRUCTURE, INC v. ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORP.

AMERICAN INFASTRUCTURE, INC v. ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Plaintiff:	AMERICAN INFASTRUCTURE, INC
Defendant:	ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Case Number:	2:2008cv02701
Filed:	June 10, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Trademark Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 28, 2010	Filing 71 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 48) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 47) IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE (DOC. 45) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE AMERICA N INFRASTRUCTURES JURY DEMAND (DOC. 46) IS DENIED AS MOOT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/28/10. 12/29/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COSTON, E-MAILED.(rf, )
February 23, 2009	Filing 33 MEMORANDUM THAT THIS IS A TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT CASE BETWEEN PRIVATE LITIGANTS INVOLVING DISCOVERY REQUESTS WHICH INCLUDE MATERIALS THAT THE PARTIES CLAIM TO BE TRADE SECRETS OR OTHER "CONFIDENTIAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR COMMERICAL INFORMATI ON." RULE 26(c) EXPRESSLY SANCTIONS THE ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDERS REGARDING THE REVELATION OF TRADE SECRETS, ETC. "GOOD CAUSE" MUST EXIST FOR SUCH PROTECTION. FURTHER THE COURT FINDS THAT THE NEED FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER OUTWEIGHS ANY LEGITIMATE PUBLIC INTEREST IN DISCLOSURE. THE ORDER CONTAINS PROCEDURES WHICH PROPERLY ALLOCATE THE BURDEN OF PROOF UNDER RULE 26(c) AND SHOULD ASSURE THE SMOOTH EXCHANGE OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL IN THIS COMPLEX CASE, THEREBY AVOIDING UNNECESSARY ADJUDICATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY ON A DOCUMENT-BY-DOCUMENT BASIS. THE COURT, THEREFORE, APPROVES THE PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 2/23/09. 2/25/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 28, 2010

Filing 71 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 48) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 47) IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE (DOC. 45) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE AMERICA N INFRASTRUCTURES JURY DEMAND (DOC. 46) IS DENIED AS MOOT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/28/10. 12/29/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COSTON, E-MAILED.(rf, )

February 23, 2009

Filing 33 MEMORANDUM THAT THIS IS A TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT CASE BETWEEN PRIVATE LITIGANTS INVOLVING DISCOVERY REQUESTS WHICH INCLUDE MATERIALS THAT THE PARTIES CLAIM TO BE TRADE SECRETS OR OTHER "CONFIDENTIAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR COMMERICAL INFORMATI ON." RULE 26(c) EXPRESSLY SANCTIONS THE ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDERS REGARDING THE REVELATION OF TRADE SECRETS, ETC. "GOOD CAUSE" MUST EXIST FOR SUCH PROTECTION. FURTHER THE COURT FINDS THAT THE NEED FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER OUTWEIGHS ANY LEGITIMATE PUBLIC INTEREST IN DISCLOSURE. THE ORDER CONTAINS PROCEDURES WHICH PROPERLY ALLOCATE THE BURDEN OF PROOF UNDER RULE 26(c) AND SHOULD ASSURE THE SMOOTH EXCHANGE OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL IN THIS COMPLEX CASE, THEREBY AVOIDING UNNECESSARY ADJUDICATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY ON A DOCUMENT-BY-DOCUMENT BASIS. THE COURT, THEREFORE, APPROVES THE PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 2/23/09. 2/25/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AMERICAN INFASTRUCTURE, INC v. ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMERICAN INFASTRUCTURE, INC
Represented By:	TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?