HETZEL v. LAMAS et al

Case Number:	2:2008cv03651
Filed:	August 1, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
Presiding Judge:	ARNOLD C. RAPOPORT
Presiding Judge:	NORMA L. SHAPIRO
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 23, 2009	Filing 12 ORDER THAT: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS ADOPTED IN PART. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE SUSTAINED IN PART. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY UNDER 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2253 (c) (1) (A) IS GRANTED AS TO PETITIONER'S OBJECTION TO THE STATE COURT REFUSAL TO GRANT A CHANGE OF VENUE/VENIRE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 6/22/09. 6/23/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fb)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 23, 2009

Filing 12 ORDER THAT: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS ADOPTED IN PART. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE SUSTAINED IN PART. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY UNDER 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2253 (c) (1) (A) IS GRANTED AS TO PETITIONER'S OBJECTION TO THE STATE COURT REFUSAL TO GRANT A CHANGE OF VENUE/VENIRE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 6/22/09. 6/23/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HETZEL v. LAMAS et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?