KUENZI v. EUROSPORT CYCLES, INC. et al
Plaintiff: JOSIAH KUENZI
Defendant: EUROSPORT CYCLES, INC., DON MURRAY, CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Case Number: 2:2008cv03906
Filed: August 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Truth in Lending Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF JOSIAH KUENZI WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING CLAIMS. JU DGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF JOSIAH KUENZI WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,192.72, PLUS INTEREST IN THE AMOUNT OF 1.13538% PER DIEM FROM 7/30/10 THROUGH THE DATE OF PAYMENT OF THE JUDGMENT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/17/11. 5/18/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTFF'S CLAIM THAT DEFENDANT VIOLATED THE TILA IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE., DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM THAT THIS POTENTIAL TILA VIOLATION CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF UTPCPL IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE., DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S OTHER CLAIMS IS GRANTED., PLAINTIFF'S CROSS MOTION TO AMEND HIS COMPLAINT IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 6/29/2009. 6/30/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS; AND E-MAILED.(tomg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KUENZI v. EUROSPORT CYCLES, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSIAH KUENZI
Represented By: REBECCA STEIGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EUROSPORT CYCLES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DON MURRAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?