VASSALOTTI v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

VASSALOTTI v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Plaintiff:	MARIA VASSALOTTI
Defendant:	WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Case Number:	2:2008cv05574
Filed:	December 1, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	ANITA B. BRODY
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 22, 2011	Filing 64 ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC #63)that DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #56) ON ALL REMAINING COUNTS OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY J UDGMENT ON COUNT IV (FCRA) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT V (UTPCPL) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT II (BREACH OF CONTRACT) IS DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PRESENT MORE AUTHORITY ON THE SAME ISSUES AT A LATER STAGE IN THE PROCEEDINGS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 9/22/2011. 9/22/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )
August 10, 2010	Filing 50 ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (Doc. #49) that DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #40) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS IV AND V OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPALINT IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 8/9/2010. 8/10/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 22, 2011

Filing 64 ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC #63)that DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #56) ON ALL REMAINING COUNTS OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY J UDGMENT ON COUNT IV (FCRA) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT V (UTPCPL) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT II (BREACH OF CONTRACT) IS DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PRESENT MORE AUTHORITY ON THE SAME ISSUES AT A LATER STAGE IN THE PROCEEDINGS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 9/22/2011. 9/22/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

August 10, 2010

Filing 50 ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (Doc. #49) that DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #40) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS IV AND V OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPALINT IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 8/9/2010. 8/10/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VASSALOTTI v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARIA VASSALOTTI
Represented By:	ROBERT P. COCCO
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?