HOLMES v. MANN BRACKEN, LLC
DELORES HOLMES |
MANN BRACKEN, LLC |
2:2009cv00424 |
January 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Consumer Credit Office |
Delaware |
ROBERT F. KELLY |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER THAT THE UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 , AND THE RESPONSES AND REPLIES THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 12/22/09. 12/22/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MALIED.(ti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HOLMES v. MANN BRACKEN, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DELORES HOLMES | |
Represented By: | ANDREW M. MILZ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MANN BRACKEN, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.