HOLMES v. MANN BRACKEN, LLC
Plaintiff: DELORES HOLMES
Defendant: MANN BRACKEN, LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv00424
Filed: January 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Consumer Credit Office
County: Delaware
Presiding Judge: ROBERT F. KELLY
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER THAT THE UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 , AND THE RESPONSES AND REPLIES THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 12/22/09. 12/22/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MALIED.(ti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOLMES v. MANN BRACKEN, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DELORES HOLMES
Represented By: ANDREW M. MILZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MANN BRACKEN, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?