BAMGBOSE v. DELTA-T GROUP, INC. et al
TEMI BAMGBOSE |
DELTA-T GROUP, INC., DELTA-T GROUP SOCIAL SERVICE STAFFING, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 4 |
2:2009cv00667 |
February 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 258 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS GRANTED. THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO FILE A JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT ON OR BEFORE 1/16/2012.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 12/9/2011. 12/12/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, ) |
Filing 188 ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OPT-INS IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S RULE 12 (b)(1) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL DOCKET THE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 6/30/10. 7/1/10 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, ) |
Filing 144 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FLSA CONDITIONAL COLLECTIVE ACTION CERTIFICATION AND JUDICIAL NOTICE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 2/8/10. 2/8/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(stb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.