WILSON et al v. PALLMAN et al
| EMILY WILSON, CLINTON SMITH and WENDY KING |
| RICHARD PALLMAN and EDWARD T. SCHAFER |
| 2:2009cv00787 |
| February 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Bucks |
| THOMAS N. ONEILL |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/14/10. 7/14/10 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE IS GRANTED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE FOR PLAINTIFFS IS GRANTED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFF WILSON'S BIVENS CLAIMS ARE DISMI SSED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF WILSON'S TITLE VII CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT VILSACK BASED ON A FAILURE TO EXHAUST A DMINSTRATIVE REMEDIES IS DENIED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF WILSON'S TITLE VII CLAIM OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DEFENDANT VILSACK IS GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF MAY AMEND HER COMPLAINT WITHIN TEN (10) BUSINESS DA YS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, DEFENDANTS ARE ORDERED TO FILE THEIR ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF WILSON'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE FILING OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/7/09. 8/10/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANT THOMAS J. VILSACK FOR EDWARD T. SCHAFER AS DEFENDANT SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE FOR PLAINTIFFS CLINT SMITH AND WEN DY KING IS TO THE USDC FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IS GRANTED AND THE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS SMITH AND KING ARE HEREBY TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF WILSON'S TITLE VII CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT VILSACK IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/15/09. 7/15/09 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
