THOMPSON et al v. US AIRWAYS, INC. et al
| GERALD THOMPSON, ELLIOT ROSARIO and TREMAYNE D. THOMAS |
| US AIRWAYS, INC., PRIME FLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE |
| 2:2009cv00870 |
| February 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| GENE E.K. PRATTER |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDERED THAT COUNTS I AND II OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ARE ASSERTED BY PLAINTIFFS WHO WERE MEMBERS OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS IN MITCHELL V. US AIRWAYS, INC. (D. MASS., NO. 1:08-CV-10629). IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED THAT IF THE PLAINTIFFS BELIEVE THAT ANY OF THE PLAINTIFFS WERE NOT MEMBERS OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS IN MITCHELL, THEY SHALL HAVE 21 DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER TO FILE A BRIEF SETTING FORTH THE BASIS FOR THIS BELIEF. DEFENDANTS SHALL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL 14 DAYS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO ANY SUCH BRIEF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/15/11. 7/20/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDERED THAT WITH REGARD TO COUNTS I, II AND IV OF THE PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT, THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 20) IS DENIED AND WITH REGARD TO COUNT III OF THE COMPLAINT, THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/15/10. 6/15/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
