MCCLATCHY v. KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff: CATHERINE MCCLATCHY
Defendant: KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2009cv01328
Filed: March 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC #24) IS DENIED. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/10/10. ) 6/11/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(gn, ) Modified on 6/11/2010 (gn, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCCLATCHY v. KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CATHERINE MCCLATCHY
Represented By: RONALD H. SURKIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?