GRIBBLE v. FOLINO et al
| WILLIAM GRIBBLE |
| LOUIS S. FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2009cv02091 |
| May 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Greene |
| MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN |
| LYNNE A. SITARSKI |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER THAT 1. THE COMMONWEALTH'S OBJECTION TO THE APRIL 23, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DOC. 149] IS OVERRULED. 2. THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE APRIL 23, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DOC. 155] ARE SUSTAINED. 3. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DOC. 144] IS ADOPTED IN PART AND NOT ADOPTED IN PART. 4. THE REPORT IS ADOPTED WITH RESPECT TO THE FINDING THAT THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE COMMONWEALTH HAD CONCEDED THERE WAS A CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION BUT THAT SHE STILL BORE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSIDER THE MERITS OF PETITIONERS HABEAS CLAIMS. 5. THE REPORT IS NOT ADOPTED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. 6. THE PARTIES MAY RENEW THEIR JOINT MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL GRANT OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [DOC. 128 AND DOC. 156] WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 7/26/24. 7/26/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS [DOC. 108] ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DOC. 106] IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 7/10/18. 7/11/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER, E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DOC.100 ] ARE SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED AND THE RULE 60(B) MOTION [DOC. 75] IS DEN IED WITH RESPECT TO CLAIMS 1-10 OF HIS ORIGINAL HABEAS PETITION, ALLEGING INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS TO THESE CLAIMS. PETITIONER'S OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE� 39;S CONCLUSION THAT MARTINEZ V. RYAN DOES NOT APPLY TO CLAIM 11 OF THE ORIGINAL HABEAS PETITION IS SUSTAINED AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO CONDUCT A MARTINEZ ANALYSIS ON CLAIM 11. THE MOTION OF THE PETITIONER FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60B(5) & EXA (6) [DOC. 58] IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE AMENDED MOTION OF THE PETITIONER FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60 (B)(5) & ((6) [DOC. 60] IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE MOTION OF THE PETITIONER FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60B(6) [DOC. 73] IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 8/29/17. 8/30/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER, E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER THAT: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THIS MATTER IS STAYED PENDING A DECISION BY THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT IN COX V. HORN, C.A. NO. 13-2982. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 3/25/14. 3/26/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED AND DENIED; AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 9/9/11. 9/13/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER THAT: BY 11/23/09, PETITIONER SHALL INFORM THE COURT HOW HE WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED WITH HIS PETITION FILED UNDER 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254. IF PETITIONER CHOOSES TO PROCEED WITH HIS HABEAS PETITION AS FILED, RESPONDENTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSE ADDRESSING THE MERITS OF PETITIONER'S CLAIMS BY 12/23/09, ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 11/10/09. 11/12/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
