PIRITO v. PENN ENGINEERING WORLD HOLDINGS et al
| CATALDO PIRITO |
| PENN ENGINEERING WORLD HOLDINGS and PENN ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING CORP. |
| 2:2009cv02396 |
| May 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| STEWART DALZELL |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR COSTS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 5/16/13. 5/16/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED`.(mbh, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER THAT PIRITO'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION IS DENIED. PENN WORLD'S PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD IS GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED IN PART. COUNT III OF THE PENN ENTITIES' COUNTERCLAIMS IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE PENN ENTITIES' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THE PENN ENTITIES' MOTION FOR COSTS IS GRANTED IN PART. BY 1/6/12, PIRITO SHALL PROVIDE SECURITY FOR COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000 BY DEPOSITING THAT AMOUNT IN THE REGISTRY OF THE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 12/22/11. 12/23/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
