GARGES v. THE PEOPLE'S LIGHT & THEATER COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: KATHERINE S. GARGES
Defendant: THE PEOPLE'S LIGHT & THEATER COMPANY, ADRIA CHARLES, JOHN DAVID CLEMENS, JR. and TERENCE ECHLIN
Case Number: 2:2009cv02456
Filed: May 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 58) IS GRANTED. COUNTS 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, AND 25 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNTS 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19-24, AND 26 ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE PAR TIES' MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOC. NOS. 67, 83, 84) ARE DEEMED MOOT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF AS TO COUNTS 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18 AND 25. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/17/2012. 12/18/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED. (aeg, )
January 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 40) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS STATED IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 1/24/12. 1/24/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab, )
October 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 8) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/28/10. 10/29/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GARGES v. THE PEOPLE'S LIGHT & THEATER COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KATHERINE S. GARGES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE PEOPLE'S LIGHT & THEATER COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADRIA CHARLES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DAVID CLEMENS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERENCE ECHLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?