HARCUM v. LEBLANC

Plaintiff: DARREN HARCUM
Defendant: MARCEL LEBLANC
Case Number: 2:2009cv02512
Filed: June 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Erie
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM H. YOHN
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2010 Filing 68 ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFT MARCEL LEBLANC AND AGAINST DARREN HARCUM. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 12/23/10. 12/23/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
October 21, 2010 Filing 62 ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFT MARCEL LEBLANC AND AGAINST PLFF DARREN HARCUM. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 10/21/10. 10/22/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
July 15, 2010 Filing 53 ORDER AS FOLLOWS: PLFF'S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEW THE MOTION IN THE EVENT OFFICER ROBINSON AND/OR OFFICER SINGLETON FAIL TO ANSWER PLFF'S INTERROGATORIES; AND PLFF'S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 7/15/10. 7/16/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
May 6, 2010 Filing 35 ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLFF'S EIGHTH AMENDED CLAIM OF EXCESSIVE FORCE RELATED TO DEFT'S ALLEGED KICK; AND THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLFF'S EIGHTH AMENDMENT C LAIMS OF EXCESSIVE FORCE RELATED TO DEFT'S USE OF KEYS AND DELAY OF MEDICAL CARE. THESE CLAIMS ARE THEREFORE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 5/6/10. 5/6/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
September 2, 2009 Filing 6 ORDER THAT: PLFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. PLFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED TO THE EXTENT THAT PLFF INVOKES THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AS A SEPERATE AND INDEPENDENT BASIS FOR RELIEF. PLFF'S DELAY OF MDEICAL CARE CLAI M IS DISMISSED. PLFF'S EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM BASED ON DEFT'S USE OF PRISON KEYS IS DISMISSED. PLFF'S EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM BASED ON DEFT'S KICKING HIM MAY PROCEED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 9/2/09. 9/2/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fb)
June 9, 2009 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT: THE PETITION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ITS REASSERTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER; IF PLFF FILES WITH THE COURT WITHIN 20 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER A NOTICE THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED WITH THIS AC TION AND THERE BY OBLIGATE HIMSELF TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE, THIS ACTION WILL BE REINSTATED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 6/8/09. 6/9/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARCUM v. LEBLANC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DARREN HARCUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARCEL LEBLANC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?