ROSENFELD v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
| STEVEN ROSENFELD |
| TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. and ANCHEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
| 2:2009cv02811 |
| June 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| BERLE M. SCHILLER |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER THAT THE PUBLISHED NOTICE DIRECTED TO THE PLAINTIFF CLASS BY ORDER OF THIS COURT DATED 2/1/2012 SATISFIES F.R.C.P. 23(e), ETC.; PLAINTIFFS ANDREW RICHARDS AND MICKI SACKLER ARE CERTIFIED AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PLAINTIFF CLASS AS DEFINED A BOVE; ALLAN KANNAR IS DESIGNATED AS LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF CLASS AND RICHARD GOLOMB IS DESIGNATED AS LIAISON COUNSEL FOR THE CLASS, AND RUBEN HONIK, CONLEE WHITELEY, AND GILLIAN WADE ARE DESIGNATED AS ADDITIONAL CLASS COUNSEL; THE SETTLEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN THE AGREEMENT DATED 1/6/2012 IS APPROVED AS FAIR, ADEQUATE AND REASONABLE, ETC.; THIS ACTION ALONG WITH THE UNDERLYING ACTIONS ARE DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 7/2/2012; 7/3/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (SEE PAPER # 198 IN 09-MD-2107). (tjd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
