CLARK et al v. KAISER IMAGING CENTER et al
MARY S. WOOD, JANICE CLARK and EVELYN KEYE |
KAISER IMAGING CENTER, FIRSTHEALTH MOORE REGIONAL HOSPITAL, DOCTORS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and KAISER PERMANENTE |
2:2009cv02970 |
July 1, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
ANITA B BRODY |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JANICE CLARK As To Kaiser Imaging Center(KATZ, MICHAEL) |
Filing 4 Return of Service by JANICE CLARK re: Defendant Kaiser Imaging Served on 7/8/09 by UPS Next Day Air (KATZ, MICHAEL) Modified on 12/9/2009 (fh, ). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JANICE CLARK, EVELYN KEYE, MARY S. WOOD As To Doctors Community Hospital(KATZ, MICHAEL) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JANICE CLARK, EVELYN KEYE, MARY S. WOOD As To Defendant Firsthealth Moore Regional Hospital with Certificate of Service.(KATZ, MICHAEL) Modified on 8/6/2009 (le, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 004420.), filed by JANICE CLARK, EVELYN KEYE, MARY S. WOOD.(ks, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2012: #1 Designation Form) (lboy, ). |
3 Summonses Issued as to FIRSTHEALTH MOORE REGIONAL HOSPITAL, KAISER IMAGING CENTER, DOCTORS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL. Forwarded To: Counsel on 7/2/09 (ks, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.