MASSEY v. FAIR ACRES GERIATRIC CENTER et al
| KENNETH MASSEY |
| FAIR ACRES GERIATRIC CENTER and DELAWARE COUNTY |
| 2:2009cv03170 |
| July 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Delaware |
| EDMUND V. LUDWIG |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE FOLLOWING ARE GRANTED: "PLAINTIFF'S...REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT ORDER, DATED 3/23/12"; "DEFENDANTS FAIR ACRES GERIATRIC CENTER AND DELAWARE COUNTY'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ". SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF KENNETH MASSEY, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE MASSEY, DECEASED, AND IN HIS OWN RIGHT, ON ALL CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 7/24/12. 7/25/12 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[FDC]
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' FAIR ACRES GERIATRIC CENTER AND DELAWARE COUNTY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT" IS GRANTED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: 1. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ON COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT; 2. S UMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ON THE SECTION 1983 CLAIM CONTAINED IN COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT. THE REMAINDER OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS DENIED. A MEMORANDUM ACCOMPANIES THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 3/23/12. 3/23/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
