STEVENS v. BEARD et al
| DERRICK STEVENS |
| JEFFREY A. BEARD, DAVID A. VARANO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2009cv03930 |
| August 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Northumberland |
| THOMAS M. GOLDEN |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
EXPLANATION AND ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONER'S LETTER OF 6/11/10 AND IN LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING EXPLANATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT PETITIONER IS GIVEN AN EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL 7/16/10 TO FILE ANY REPLY ON RESPONDENTS.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 6/16/10. 6/17/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF HABEAS CORPUS COUNSEL (DOC. NO. 5) AND MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (DOC. NO. 4) ARE DENIED.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 4/8/10. 4/8/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER THAT A RULING UPON PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DEFERRED UNTIL RECEIPT OF RESPONDENTS' ANSWER TO HIS PETITION.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 2/19/10. 2/22/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED TO PARTIES.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
