MCKEON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
THOMAS MCKEON |
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT, MICHAEL CASSIDY and MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISIONER |
2:2009cv04571 |
October 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Schuykill |
JAN E. DUBOIS |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE AMENDED COMPLAINT OF VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS FILED ON 4/2/10 IS DISMISSED AS LEGALLY FRIVOLOUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(e)(2), WITH LEAVE TO FILE A FOURTH COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 4/26/10. 4/26/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(fb) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM, FILED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 2/23/10. 2/24/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fb) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT: THE PETITION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ITS REASSERTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER; IF PLFF FILES WITH THE COURT WITHIN 20 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER A NOTICE THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION AND THEREBY OBLIGATE HIMSELF TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE, THIS ACTION WILL BE REINSTATED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 10/29/09. 10/30/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.