UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. YU et al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
PIL HYUN YU, YONG HYUN YU, JUNG HEE YU, JOONG HYUN YU, COMMERCE BANK and T.D. BANKNORTH |
2:2009cv04742 |
October 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
THOMAS N. ONEILL |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT TD BANK'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED AND THIS COURT'S ORDER OF 2/14/12 IS VACATED TO THE EXTENT THAT IT ENTERS JUDGMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSSCLAIMS ASSERTED BY TD BANK. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, TD BANK'S MOTION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT TD BANK'S COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSSCLAIMS ARE STAYED PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE COMPLAINT IN MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE FILED BY TD BANK IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA., DOCKET NO. 11-24794. THE PARTIES SHALL UPDATE THE COURT ON THE STATUS OF THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY ACTION EVERY SIX MONTHS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 3/20/12. 3/20/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED UNREPS, E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDE THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THE ABOVE ACTION IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST DEFENDANT AS OUTLINED IN HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/14/2012. 2/14/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, E-MAILED.(kk, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.