ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. STEPHEN M. RIOS, D.C. et al
| ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| STEPHEN M. RIOS, D.C., RIOS CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.C., JR AUTO BODY & COLLISION, JERRY BLASSENGALE, JR., WALLACE MORRIS, REYNALDO RIVERA, CHRISTOPHER ROSALES, ROSARIO TEDESCO and ROSARIO TEDESCO, JR. |
| 2:2009cv05208 |
| November 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| Plaintiff |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SEPARATE AND FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS STEPHEN M. RIOS, D.C. AND RIOS CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. IS GRANTED AS TO THE LIABILITY OF STEPHEN M. RIOS, D.C. AND RIOS CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.C. RULING ON THE ENTRY OF A SEPARATE AND FINAL JUDGMENT FOR DAMAGES IS DEFERRED UNTIL THIS COURT HOLDS AN ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES HEARING, WHICH WILL BE SCHEDULED AFTER THE SENTENCING OF STEPHEN M. RIOS IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. RIOS, ET AL., NO. 10-CR-95. THIS CASE REMAINS IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 12/15/2010. 12/16/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS; AND E-MAILED.(md)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
