COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BOLICK et al
COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT |
THOMAS BOLICK, II and THOMAS BOLICK, III |
2:2009cv05604 |
November 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Bucks |
PETRESE B. TUCKER |
None |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 Appeal From The Decision Of The Special Education Appeals Panel (IDEIA) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WHICH THE COURT HAS CONSTRUED AS A MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS DE NIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 12/20/10.12/22/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER FOR THE APPEARANCE OF BIAS AND/OR PREJUDICE 28 , AND THE RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION THERETO 31 , FILED BY PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECR EED THAT DEFENDANTS/COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS' SECOND MOTION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE PETRESE TUCKER FOR THE APPEARANCE OF BIAS AND/OR PREJUDICE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/9/10. 9/13/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.