CEPHAS v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY et al
DARREN CEPHAS |
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and GEO |
2:2009cv06014 |
December 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
M. FAITH ANGELL |
LOUIS H. POLLAK |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, DOCKET NO. 24 , GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND THE COURT REQUESTS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO FORWARD THIS CASE TO THE PRO SE PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS PANEL FOR CONSIDERATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 7/11/11. 7/12/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Filing 18 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS 11 , IS GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST GWHCF ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANT GEO GROUP, INC. 11 , IS GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST GEO ARE DISMISSE D WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF TO CONTINUE COMPLAINT 13 , IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IS FILED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 7/20/10. 7/20/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREP, E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.