STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. FICCHI et al
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY |
STEPHEN FICCHI, FRANK SHENKO, J. WILLIAM KNOX, ORTHO-SPORT REHABILITATION, LLC, FICCHI, STEPHEN, D.O.P.C., OLNEY PAIN MANAGEMENT, LLC, BENSALEM PAIN MANAGEMENT CENTER, LLC and SOUTH PHILADELPHIA PAIN MANAGEMENT, LLC |
2:2010cv00555 |
February 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
GENE E.K. PRATTER |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDERED THAT THE KNOX/SHENKO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 45) IS DENIED. THE FICCHI DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 46) IS DENIED. THE KNOX/SHENKO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS (DOCKET NO. 65) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/4/12. 5/4/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, ) |
Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 14) WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL REASONS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/10/11. 6/13/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.