GREEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| TYRONE GREEN |
| CHESTER COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, GRANDIZIO and THEODORE G. SCHNEINDER |
| 2:2010cv00568 |
| February 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Huntingdon |
| MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 15) IS GRANTED. PLAINITFF'S MOTION TO AMEND CIVIL COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 20) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (DOC. NO. 29) IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS. THIS CASE SHALL BE MARKED CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 7/30/10. 7/30/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL. (jpd)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS EXCEPT CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, DETECTIVE GRANDIZZIO AND DETECTIVE SCHNEIDER ARE DISMISSED. THE COMPLAINT IS TO BE FILED, SUMMONS ARE TO ISSUE, SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLIANT IS TO BE MADE UPON THE DEFENDANTS BY THE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE IN THE EVENT THAT WAIVER OF SERVICE IS NOT EFFECTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 3/18/10. 3/18/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
