TAGGART v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC. et al
| KENNETH J. TAGGART |
| WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., DOES, EAGLE NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE COMPANY and AMERICAN PARTNERS BANK |
| 2:2010cv00843 |
| March 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Bucks |
| LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT EAGLE NATIONWIDE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 96) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS ACTION AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 6/17/2013. 6/18/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED; AND MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREP. (ems)
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. #95) IS DENIED; AND DEFT'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. #97) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/27/2012. 9/27/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREP, E-MAILED.(tomg, )
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AND THE CLAIMS AGAINST THEM ARE DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/27/2010. 9/28/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PROSE AND UNREP, E-MAILED.(kk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
