IDEARC MEDIA LLC v. GLASSMAN
Plaintiff: IDEARC MEDIA LLC
Defendant: DAVID JAY GLASSMAN
Case Number: 2:2010cv01216
Filed: March 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: LOUIS H. POLLAK
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1452
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER THAT, FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 2/14/11. 2/15/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IDEARC MEDIA LLC v. GLASSMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IDEARC MEDIA LLC
Represented By: JAMES W. ADELMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID JAY GLASSMAN
Represented By: DAVID JAY GLASSMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?