DEELEY v. GENESIS HEALTHCARE et al
| RONALD DEELEY |
| JENNIFER VALINOTTI and GENESIS HEALTHCARE |
| 2:2010cv01242 |
| March 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| THOMAS N. ONEILL |
| THOMAS N. ONEILL |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND HIS COMPLAINT DENIED, AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT VALINOTTI IS HEREBY GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST JENNIFER VALINOTTI ARE DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES SHALL CONFER AND AGREE UPON A REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER AND SUBMIT SAME TO THE COURT WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/28/2011. 7/29/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES, E-MAILED.(kp, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/16/10. 8/16/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(dp, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF HAVING FILED AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON JUNE 14, 2010.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 6/15/2010.6/16/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jmf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
