SMITH v. REBSTOCK et al
| HARRY F. SMITH |
| FRANCIS F. REBSTOCK, EUGENE EDWARD T. MAIER, DAMIEN SAMMONS, KATHERINE LEWIS and FELINA GUSTOSON |
| 2:2010cv01515 |
| April 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| LOUIS H. POLLAK |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLFF'S 10/5/2010 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFT FELINA GUSTOSON AS WELL AS PLFF'S 10/5/2010 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFT DAMIEN SAMMONS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT BOTH REQUESTS ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/16/12. 5/18/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER THAT DEFT, KATHERINE LEWIS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED & SMITH'S CLAIMS AGAINST LEWIS ARE DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 8/2/11. 8/4/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS REBSTOCK AND MAIER'S MOTION TO DISMISS, SEE DKT. 6, IS GRANTED, AND THAT SMITH'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, AS TO REBSTOCK AND MAIER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 3/31/11. 4/1/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(er, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
