PIONTEK v. BB&T CORPORATION
Plaintiff: VICKI PIONTEK
Defendant: BB&T CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2010cv02133
Filed: May 10, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: JOHN P. FULLAM
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS DISMISSED AS THIS COURT LACKS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE DEFENDANT. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THE CASE-FILE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN P. FULLAM ON 6/7/2010. 6/8/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(tomg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PIONTEK v. BB&T CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VICKI PIONTEK
Represented By: CORY D. PIONTEK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BB&T CORPORATION
Represented By: JAMES L. BEAUSOLEIL, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?