CSB-SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL INC. v. SAP AMERICA, INC.
CSB-SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL INC. |
SAP AMERICA, INC. |
2:2010cv02156 |
May 11, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO UNCLEAN HANDS IS DENIED AS MOOT IN LIGHT OF DEFENDANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF DEFENSE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 5/9/12. 5/10/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
Filing 140 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT LIMITING CSB'S CLAIM FOR DAMAGESIS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT CSB IS DEEMED TO HAVE LEGAL STANDING TO SEEK DAMAGES ONLY FOR SAP'S ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT THAT CSB CAN PROVE OCCURRED ON OR AFTER 3/29/12. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 4/30/12. 5/1/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
Filing 137 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO WILLFUL INFRINGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 4/25/12. 4/26/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
Filing 135 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT IS GRANTED ON PLAINTIFF'S THEORY OF LITERAL INFRINGEMENT BUT DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S THEORY OF INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 4/17/12. 4/17/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
Filing 132 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT SAP AMERICA, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF EACH CLAIM OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,631,953 FOR CLAIMING BOTH AN APPARATUS AND A METHOD (DOC. NO. 66) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 3/30/2012. 4/2/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems) |
Filing 65 ORDER THAT THE DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS IN U.S. PATENT NO. 5,631,953 ("953 PATENT") ARE CONSTRUED. DEFENDANT'S ARGUMENT THAT CERTAIN TERMS OF THE '953 PATENT ARE INDEFINITE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO RE-R AISE IT DURING SUMMARY JUDDGMENT PROCEEDINGS. DEFENDANT'S POST-MARKMAN HEARING REQUEST TO CONSTRUE PHRASES NOT PREVIOUSLY ADDRESSED BY THE PARTIES' OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 7/27/11. 7/29/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CSB-SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL INC. v. SAP AMERICA, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CSB-SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL INC. | |
Represented By: | WAYNE A. GRAVER |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SAP AMERICA, INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.