LIVERMAN v. GUBERNIK et al
| DARRYL LIVERMAN |
| HARRIS GUBERNIK, TERRANCE MOORE, TOM NOON, CHARLES MARTIN, DIANE M. ELLIS-MARSEGLIA, STEPHEN SHANTZ, SEAN RYAN, SUSAN SCOTT DEVLIN, EDWARD DONNELLY, RAY MCHUGH and JOAN CROWE |
| 2:2010cv02500 |
| May 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Bucks |
| JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
OPINION THAT FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, THE COURT WILL DENY PLFF'S MOTION TO ALTER/AMEND JUDGMENT (CIV. A. NO. 10-1161, DOC. NO. 20). AN APPROPRIATE ORDER FOLLOWS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/15/10. 10/18/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE COMPLAINTS IN CIVIL ACTIONS NOS. 10-1161, 10-2049, AND 10-2500 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ANY OUTSTANDING MOTIONS CIVIL ACTION NOS. 10-1161, 10-2049, 10-2550 AND 10-2558 ARE DENIED; DARRYL LIVERMAN IS ENJOINED FROM INSTITUTIN G ANY NEW PRO SE CIVIL SUITS IN THIS COURT OR FROM FILING ANY AMENDED COMPLAINTS OR DOCUMENTS IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASES, WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION OF ANY JUDGE OF THIS COURT, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/21/10. 9/22/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
