LAMPKIN et al v. GAPPA et al
MICHELLE LAMPKIN and LOUIS R. LAMPKIN, JR. |
LOUIS A. GAPPA and GAPPA FUEL OIL COMPANY, INC. |
2:2010cv03015 |
June 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
M. FAITH ANGELL |
LOUIS H. POLLAK |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER THAT DEFT GAPPA FUEL OIL COMPANY INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS HEREBY GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, & COUNT ONE OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO GAPPA FUEL OIL COMPANY INC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT GAPPA FUEL OIL COMPANY INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFT LOUIS P. GAPPA' CROSS-CLAIMS IS HEREBY GRANTED & THE CROSS-CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 3/18/12. 3/21/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT GAPPA FUEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS, SEE DKT. 6, IS HEREBY GRANTED, AND LAMPKIN'S COMPLAINT AGAINST GAPPA FUEL IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO ALL COUNTS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT GAPPA FUEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS G APPA'S CROSSCLAIM, SEE DKT. 17, IS HEREBY GRANTED, AND GAPPA'S CROSSCLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. BOTH LAMPKIN AND GAPPA MAY AMEND THEIR RESPECTIVE PLEADINGS NO LATER THAN 20 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 3/27/2011. 4/1/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.