BRANDL v. ACE USA et al
PAULA BRANDL |
ACE USA, ACE INA HOLDING, INC, ESIS, INC., INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, CIGNA CORPORATION and CIGNA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INC |
2:2010cv03512 |
July 16, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Chester |
THOMAS N. ONEILL |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/7/2011. 2/8/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED. (kk, ) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS' ACE MOTION TO STAY AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF IS COMPELLED TO ARBITRATE HER CLAIMS AGAINST THE ACE, PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ARE STAYED PENDING RESOLUTION OF ARBITRATION OR FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY IS DENIED AS MOOT ; DEFENDANTS' LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA MOTIONT TO DISMISS IS GRANTED, PLAINTIFF'S S HORT TERM DISABILITY,WAGE PAYMENT AND COLLECTION ACT AND BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT LINA ARE DISMISSED, PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE IS DISMISSED, AND PLAINTIFF'S JURY TRIAL DEMAND IS STRICKEN WITH RESPECT TO HER CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 1/14/2011. 1/14/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED. (kk, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.