ANDERSON v. COHEN
Plaintiff: JAMES ANDERSON
Defendant: PAMELA PRYOR COHEN
Case Number: 2:2010cv04531
Filed: September 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: RONALD L. BUCKWALTER
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(g); THE MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THIS CASE SHALL BE MARKED CLOSED STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/20/10. 10/21/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(fb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANDERSON v. COHEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAMELA PRYOR COHEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES ANDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?