HUFFMAN et al v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: CLARK R. HUFFMAN and BRANDI K. WINTERS
Defendant: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Case Number: 2:2010cv05135
Filed: September 30, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: JOHN P. FULLAM
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REISSUANCE AND MOTION FOR CY PRES DISTRIBUTION, ECF NOS. 198 -99, ARE GRANTED. THE SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR IS AUTHORIZED TO REISSUE REPLACEMENT CHECKS TO FIVE CLASS MEMBERS, CAROLYN DELECOUR, PHYLLIS CRUISE, LUCILL E PERKINS, ROBERT G. DORUSINEC, AND JACQUELINE GOLDKLANG, IN THE AMOUNTS SET FORTH IN THE PIRRUNG DECLARATION, SUBMITTED ALONG WITH PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AT ECF NO. 199-2. NO FURTHER REQUESTS BY CLASS MEMBERS FOR REISSUANCE OF CHECKS SHA LL BE PERMITTED. THE BALANCE OF THE SETTLEMENT FUNDS, TOTALING $26,241.48 AFTER THE FIVE CHECKS ARE REISSUED, SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED IN EQUAL SHARES TO TWO NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, PENNSYLVANIA LEGAL AID NETWORK, INC. AND JUSTICE IN AGING. CLASS COUNSEL SHALL DOCKET AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT THAT THESE DISTRIBUTIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 8/6/20. 8/6/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
April 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER THAT THIS COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS LITIGATION AND OVER ALL PARTIES TO THIS LITIGATION, INCLUDING ALL MEMBERS OF THE CLASS. THE MAILING OF INDIVIDUAL NOTICE TO EACH INDIVIDUAL CLASS MEMBER AS SPECIFIED IN THIS COURT 'S PRIOR ORDER SATISFIES DUE PROCESS AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23. NO CLASS MEMBERS FILED A FORMAL OBJECTION TO THE SETTLEMENT AND...NO_ CLASS MEMBERS APPEARED AT THE HEARING TO OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT. THE COURT HEREBY APPROVES THE S ETTLEMENT SET FORTH IN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND IN THE DISTRIBUTION PLAN AND FINDS THAT SAID SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION PLAN ARE IN ALL RESPECTS, FAIR, REASONABLE AND ADEQUATE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE CLASS THAT INCLUDES; ETC. AS HEREIN. THIS ENTIRE ACTION IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO THE SETTLED CLAIMS OF THE CLASS MEMBERS, AND WITHOUT TAXABLE COSTS TO THE PARTIES; ETC. AS HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/4/19. 4/5/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
March 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 181 OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION OF RULE 23(f) INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL, ECF NO. 176, IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE THE OPINIONS AND TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFFS' EXPERT CHAD STALLER, ECF NO. 166, IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/12/18. 3/13/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
January 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 175 OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT THE ORDERS DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION, ECF NO. 164, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/29/18. 1/29/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
December 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 162 OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NOS. 149-150 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 151, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 12/6/17. 12/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, ECF NO. 119, IS DENIED. 2. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROBERT D. WILLIG, ECF NO. 125, IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/30/2016. 9/30/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
July 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO FIDUCIARY STATUS (DOC. NO. 69) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN LIGHT OF THE AMENDMENT OF THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 5/20/2015. 5/23/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUFFMAN et al v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CLARK R. HUFFMAN
Represented By: M. SCOTT BARRETT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRANDI K. WINTERS
Represented By: M. SCOTT BARRETT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Represented By: ALISON V. DOUGLASS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?