UNITED BENEFIT FUND v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District UNITED BENEFIT FUND v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE

UNITED BENEFIT FUND v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE

Plaintiff:	UNITED BENEFIT FUND
Defendant:	GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Case Number:	2:2010cv05419
Filed:	October 14, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge:	CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 23, 2013	Filing 29 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND IN C.A. 09-730 IS DENIED; PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE A STATUS REPORT WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER INDICATING WHETHER IT WISHES TO WITHDRAW ITS OPPOSED MOTIO N FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF UFCW LOCAL 1776 IN C.A. 10-2475 IS DENIED; THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF UNITED BENEFIT FUND IN C.A. 10-5419 IS DENIED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART; THE UTPCLP CLAIM ASSE RTED ON ITS OWN BEHALF IS DISMISSED; UNITED BENEFIT FUND'S NEW YORK STATE CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THE MOTIONS TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/22/2013; 10/24/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 3619 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 23, 2013

Filing 29 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND IN C.A. 09-730 IS DENIED; PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE A STATUS REPORT WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER INDICATING WHETHER IT WISHES TO WITHDRAW ITS OPPOSED MOTIO N FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF UFCW LOCAL 1776 IN C.A. 10-2475 IS DENIED; THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF UNITED BENEFIT FUND IN C.A. 10-5419 IS DENIED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART; THE UTPCLP CLAIM ASSE RTED ON ITS OWN BEHALF IS DISMISSED; UNITED BENEFIT FUND'S NEW YORK STATE CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THE MOTIONS TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/22/2013; 10/24/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 3619 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED BENEFIT FUND v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED BENEFIT FUND
Represented By:	HALLEY FINKELSTEIN ASCHER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?