BALDWIN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Plaintiff: CHRISTINE BALDWIN
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Case Number: 2:2010cv05642
Filed: October 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT 6 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DIMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 5/20/2014; 5/21/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (SEE PAPER # 4021 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BALDWIN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTINE BALDWIN
Represented By: THOMAS P. CARTMELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?