LOHR v. KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C. et al
| KRISTA V. LOHR |
| KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C., CRAIG KIMMEL, ROBERT SILVERMAN and ANGELA TROCCOLI |
| 2:2010cv05857 |
| October 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES IS GRANTED AND DENIED IN PART. THE CROSS MOTION OF DEFENDANT FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IS GRANTED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (1); ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 10/14/11. 10/14/11 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT TO DISMISS COUNT X OF THE COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION IS GRANTED. THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF KRISTA V. LOHR TO STRIKE THE AFFIDAVIT OF MATTHEW A. PORTER IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS COUNTS I,II,III, VII AND IX OF THE COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIMS ARE GRANTED. THE MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C., CRAIG KIMMEL AND ROBERT SILVERMAN TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT ARE OTHERWISE DENIED; ETC. SIGNED BY JUDGE HARVEY BARTLE. 4/28/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (JL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
