GORMAN v. WARWICK TOWNSHIP et al
Plaintiff: MICHEALE A. GORMAN
Defendant: WARWICK TOWNSHIP, EDWARD LOUX, AARON A. RICHWINE and BARRY J. SZAMBOTI
Case Number: 2:2010cv06760
Filed: November 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Bucks
Presiding Judge: J. CURTIS JOYNER
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON ALL OF THE COUNTS OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN NO AMOUNT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 4/23/12. 4/26/12 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[FDC]
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: COUNT I IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS AGAINST DEFENDANTS HUEBER AND SZAMBOTI AND WITH PREJUDICE AS AGAINST DEFEND ANT WARWICK TOWNSHIP. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS HUEBER AND SZAMBOTI WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE ENTRY DATE OF THIS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. COUNTS II AND III OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PR EJUDICE IN THEIR ENTIRETY. COUNTS V, VI AND VII ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS AGAINST BOTH OF THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS NAMED THEREIN IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AND AGAINST WARWICK TOWNSHIP. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE DISMIS SED WITH PREJUDICE AS AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS SAVE FOR OFFICER EDWARD LOUX. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 3/31/11. 4/1/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fdc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GORMAN v. WARWICK TOWNSHIP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHEALE A. GORMAN
Represented By: CRAIG A. SOPIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARWICK TOWNSHIP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD LOUX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AARON A. RICHWINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BARRY J. SZAMBOTI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?