NELSON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Petitioner: DWIGHT NELSON
Respondent: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Case Number: 2:2010mc00184
Filed: September 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Motion to Quash
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION TO QUASH SUMMONS 5 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/5/11. 1/5/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(ti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NELSON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Represented By: BRITTNEY N. CAMPBELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DWIGHT NELSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?