TRADER v. S. et al
| OSSIE ROBERT TRADER |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, ERIC HOLDER, WILLIAM B. CARR, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, OFFICE OF THE CLERK, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, R. S., SETH WEBER and KAREN L. CORIGSBY |
| 2:2011cv00039 |
| January 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| PETER G. SHERIDAN |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL RE-OPEN THE DOCKET IN THIS MATTER, PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FILE THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR SECURITY THE CLERK SHALL SERVE A CO PY OF THIS ORDER UPON THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRCIT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND THE WARDEN OF USP ATLANTA, GEORGIA AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS AND MALICIOUS AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLA IM AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS DISMISSAL SHALL COUNT AS A "STRIKE" FOR PURPOSES OF 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(g), PLAINTIFF IS ASSESSED A FILING FEE OF $350.00 WHICH SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM PLAINTIFF'S ACCOUNT, ETC. THE CLERK SHALL RE-CLOSE THE COURT'S FILE IN THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY PETER G. SHERIDAN ON 5/2/11. 5/3/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
