ATLANTIS PETROLEUM, LLC v. GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC. et al
| ATLANTIS PETROLEUM, LLC |
| SEMYON LOGOVINSKY, LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION and GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC. |
| 2:2011cv02517 |
| April 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| R. BARCLAY SURRICK |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2801 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT GETTY PETROEUM MARKETING, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF ATLANTIS PETROLEUM, LLC'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GETTY'S COUNTERCLAIMS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 9/15/11. 9/16/11 ENTERED AND E-MAILED AND FAXED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF ATANTIS PETROLEUM, LLC MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS GRANTED. ATLANTIS SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO POST A BOND. THIS ORDER SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT. A FURTHER HEARING ON THE MOTION SHALL BE HELD BEFORE THIS COURT ON 4/27/11 AT 10:00 A.M.; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 4/19/11. 4/20/11 ENTERED AND E-MAILED AND FAXED, MAILED TO UNREP.(jl, ) Modified on 4/21/2011 (jl, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
