K.A. et al v. UPPER PERKIOMEN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
| K.A., JENNIFER ALLEBACH and BRIAN ALLEBACH |
| TIMOTHY KIRBY, PH.D., UPPER PERKIOMEN SCHOOL DISTRICT, DUANE WICKARD and ARTHUR VIGILANTE |
| 2:2011cv02610 |
| April 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| M. FAITH ANGELL |
| LOUIS H. POLLAK |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARNOLD C. RAPOPORT IS APPROVE AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION UNDER 28 USC, SECTION 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 8/10/12. 8/13/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(FILED IN ERROR)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE M. FAITH ANGELL DATED 3/12/12, IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS TO COUNTS V,VI,VII,VIII,IX AND X OF K.A.'S COMPLAINT; AND, DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS XI,XII,XIII,XIV,XV, AND XVI OF K.A.'S COMPLAINT, BY CONSENT OF COUNSEL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/21/12. 6/21/12 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[FDC]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
