LIVINGSTON v. JOHN DOE APPEL et al
| ANDRE LIVINGSTON |
| JOHN DOE APPEL, JOHN DOE'S & JANE DOE'S, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and JULIO M. ALGARIN |
| 2:2011cv02764 |
| April 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINSTRATIVE REMEDIES, AND ANY RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/21/15. 7/22/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC.'S MOTION 7 IS GRANTED; DEFENDANTS LT. EDWARD APPEL AND WARDEN JULIO ALGARIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS 8 IS GRANTED IN PART, AS TO DEFENDANT WARDEN JULIO ALGARIN, AND DENIED IN PART, AS TO D EFENDANT LT. EDWARD APPEL; THE PARTIES SHALL TAKE DISCOVERY INITIALLY; PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THRITY (30) DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 12/5/14. 12/5/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
