ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
| ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA |
| GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA |
| ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 2:2011cv02838 |
| April 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JUAN R. SANCHEZ |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CNIC, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA. GLOBAL SHALL PAY TO CNIC $561,718 REPRESENTING PAS T BILLINGS THROUGH 1/25/2012, PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST AT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATUTORY RATE OF 6%. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF CNIC AND AGAINST GLOBAL ON COUNT TWO OF THE COMPLAINT. GLOBAL SHALL PAY ALL FUTURE BILLINGS ON THE MARLEY CLAIM MA DE ON THE SAME BASIS AS THE BILLINGS AT ISSUE IN THIS CASE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF CNIC AND AGAINST GLOBAL ON GLOBAL'S COUNTERCLAIM. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/30/2013. 4/1/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
