ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Counter_claimant: GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Counter_defendant: ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 2:2011cv02838
Filed: April 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: JUAN R. SANCHEZ
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CNIC, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA. GLOBAL SHALL PAY TO CNIC $561,718 REPRESENTING PAS T BILLINGS THROUGH 1/25/2012, PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST AT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATUTORY RATE OF 6%. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF CNIC AND AGAINST GLOBAL ON COUNT TWO OF THE COMPLAINT. GLOBAL SHALL PAY ALL FUTURE BILLINGS ON THE MARLEY CLAIM MA DE ON THE SAME BASIS AS THE BILLINGS AT ISSUE IN THIS CASE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF CNIC AND AGAINST GLOBAL ON GLOBAL'S COUNTERCLAIM. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/30/2013. 4/1/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: CHRISTINE GELLERT RUSSELL
Represented By: BRENDAN D. MCQUIGGAN
Represented By: ELLEN K. BURROWS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Represented By: R. PATRICK BEDELL
Represented By: WILLIAM F. MCDEVITT
Represented By: MARK G. SHERIDAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Represented By: R. PATRICK BEDELL
Represented By: WILLIAM F. MCDEVITT
Represented By: MARK G. SHERIDAN
Represented By: R. PATRICK BEDELL
Represented By: WILLIAM F. MCDEVITT
Represented By: MARK G. SHERIDAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: BRENDAN D. MCQUIGGAN
Represented By: CHRISTINE GELLERT RUSSELL
Represented By: BRENDAN D. MCQUIGGAN
Represented By: CHRISTINE GELLERT RUSSELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?